🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Momentum

In Europe, a increasing group of countries are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation may be enacted next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to verify the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has urged the legislature to pass a proposal lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a advisory statement demanding a ban for minors except if parental consent is given. While it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a good starting point," commented the MEP driving the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by conclusive research".

Last year, interest gathered behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. However, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have raised warnings. An organization set up by the family of a young person who took her own life after viewing dangerous platform posts suggests that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to create tools that are secure and suitable for children," stated a prominent peer.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, legislation is primarily occurring at the local level amid country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a law banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a regulation limiting under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with any further access needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures mandating parental consent for minors to open social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from various individuals to mimic this lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Outside of Europe and the US, additional countries are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world organizations strike a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The body notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

While this worldwide debate unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and others indicate that governments globally are increasingly prepared to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.